What is the Difference Between Triadic and Traditional Supervision?
By Shannon Heers
So, you’re on your way to becoming a fully licensed counselor—congratulations! Now, it’s time to make some big decisions about your clinical supervision. Should you go the traditional route or try out triadic supervision? If you’re scratching your head wondering what the difference is, don’t worry—you’re not alone.
Let’s break it down so you can decide what’s best for your journey to licensure as an LMHC in Washington.
What is Traditional Supervision?
Traditional supervision is what most people think of when they hear “clinical supervision.” It typically comes in two formats:
- Individual Supervision – Just you and your supervisor. One-on-one, focused attention, and deep case discussions.
- Group Supervision – A larger group of supervisees meets with one supervisor, discussing cases, sharing insights, and learning from each other.
Traditional supervision has been around forever. It’s reliable, structured, and provides individualized guidance (especially in one-on-one sessions). If you’re someone who thrives on deep dives and uninterrupted focus, this might be your best bet.
What is Triadic Supervision?
Triadic supervision is like the perfect middle ground. Instead of flying solo or getting lost in a big group, you meet with your supervisor alongside one other supervisee. Think of it as the buddy system—counseling edition.
Washington State allows triadic supervision to count the same as individual supervision toward licensure requirements (WAC 246-809-334), so you’re not losing out on credit hours.
During triadic supervision, you and your fellow supervisee take turns presenting cases, discussing interventions, and getting feedback. Your supervisor guides the discussion while also letting you learn from each other.
Key Differences Between Triadic and Traditional Supervision
So, what makes triadic supervision different? Let’s compare:
| Feature | Traditional Supervision | Triadic Supervision |
| Format | One-on-one (individual) or larger groups | Two supervisees, one supervisor |
| Personalized Attention | High in individual, lower in group | Moderate—still personal but with peer input |
| Peer Learning | Limited in individual, high in group | Strong peer learning from a fellow supervisee |
| Cost | Higher for individual, lower for group | More affordable than individual, pricier than group |
| Discussion Style | Supervisor-led | Supervisor-guided, peer-enhanced |
Pros and Cons of Triadic Supervision
Pros:
- More affordable than individual supervision – You split the cost with one other supervisee.
- More personalized than group supervision – You still get focused time, but also gain insight from your peer.
- More perspectives = more learning – Hearing how another supervisee approaches a case can expand your clinical toolkit.
- Collaborative growth – You learn to give and receive feedback, preparing you for real-world teamwork in mental health settings.
Cons:
- Less one-on-one time than individual supervision – You’re sharing the spotlight with another supervisee.
- Requires good chemistry with your co-supervisee – If you and your triadic partner have very different styles, it could be a bit tricky.
- Might not be ideal for highly complex cases – If you need deep, individual-focused guidance on every case, traditional individual supervision might be better.
Who Should Choose Triadic Supervision?
Triadic supervision is a great fit if you:
- Want a balance between personalized supervision and peer learning.
- Are looking for a cost-effective alternative to individual supervision.
- Enjoy learning from others and discussing different clinical perspectives.
- Prefer a structured, but slightly flexible approach.
However, if you’re dealing with complex cases that require extensive one-on-one time, or if you thrive best in private settings, traditional individual supervision may be a better fit.
How to Find the Right Supervision Format in Washington
If you’re leaning toward triadic supervision (or still deciding), here’s how to explore your options:
- Check the Washington State Licensing Board – Look for approved supervisors who offer both triadic and traditional formats.
- Ask Current Supervisors – Many offer multiple formats, so they might have flexibility.
- Network with Other Counselors – Ask peers what worked for them. You might even find a co-supervisee looking for a triadic setup!
- Browse Online Directories – Websites like TherapyDen, Psychology Today, and state counseling associations list clinical supervisors.
- Join Professional Groups – Washington-based counseling groups on Facebook or LinkedIn can help you connect with supervisors and peers.
- Check out Firelight Supervision – Offers virtual triadic supervision from experienced and approved Washington state supervisors.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between triadic supervision and traditional supervision comes down to your learning style, budget, and supervision goals. If you want one-on-one depth, go traditional. If you love collaboration and cost savings, triadic could be the perfect fit.
Either way, you’re gaining valuable experience on your path to licensure. The right supervision format will help you grow into the best counselor you can be.
How we can help
If you’re ready to take the next step, start reaching out to supervisors today—your future as a licensed counselor is just around the corner! Schedule a free 20-minute phone consultation today and discover how we can support you on your journey.
Author Bio
Shannon Heers is a psychotherapist, approved clinical supervisor, guest blogger, and the owner of a group psychotherapy practice in the Denver area. Shannon helps adults in professional careers manage anxiety, depression, work-life balance, and grief and loss. Follow Firelight Supervision on Instagram and Facebook.
Leave a Comment